OPENING BORDERS, ACHIEVING RESULTS
315 W. 9th St., Suite 801 | Los Angeles, CA  90015  |  LocationService Area

Motion to Reopen in Immigration: Presenting New Evidence to Revisit Denied Cases

Immigration law is one of the most complex areas of U.S. law, with many applications and petitions requiring strict adherence to procedural rules and evidentiary standards. Denials, unfortunately, are not uncommon—whether it involves a visa petition, green card application, asylum claim, or relief in removal proceedings. When a case is denied, applicants often feel discouraged and unsure of what options remain. One important procedural tool in these situations is the motion to reopen. Unlike a motion to reconsider, which focuses on legal errors in the original decision, a motion to reopen allows applicants to present new evidence or information that was not previously available and argue that this evidence should change the outcome of the case.

What Is a Motion to Reopen?

A motion to reopen is a formal request asking the same decision-making body—whether USCIS, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), or an immigration judge—to reopen a case after a denial in order to consider new facts or evidence. It does not claim that the original decision was wrong at the time it was made; instead, it argues that new developments or previously unavailable information now warrant a different result. For example, if an asylum application was denied because the applicant did not have sufficient documentation, but new evidence has since come to light that supports the claim, a motion to reopen could allow that evidence to be considered.

When Can a Motion to Reopen Be Filed?

Motions to reopen are used in many immigration contexts:

  • Before USCIS: If USCIS denies an application or petition, such as for adjustment of status or naturalization, applicants may file a motion to reopen with new supporting documents.
  • Before an Immigration Judge: Respondents in removal proceedings can file motions to reopen if they obtain new evidence or if their circumstances materially change.
  • Before the BIA: When the BIA denies an appeal, a motion to reopen may be filed to present evidence that was not previously available.

Strict deadlines apply. In most cases, motions to reopen must be filed within 90 days of the final decision. Exceptions exist, such as when the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) joins in the motion, when the motion is based on changed country conditions in asylum cases, or when ineffective assistance of counsel can be proven.

Key Differences Between a Motion to Reopen and a Motion to Reconsider

The terms “motion to reopen” and “motion to reconsider” are sometimes confused, but they serve very different purposes:

  • Motion to Reopen: Relies on new evidence or changed circumstances that were not available at the time of the original decision.
  • Motion to Reconsider: Challenges a decision on the grounds that the law was misapplied or misunderstood, without adding new evidence.

Sometimes, applicants may file both motions together if they believe both new evidence and legal error exist.

What Evidence Is Needed for a Motion to Reopen?

To succeed, a motion to reopen must present evidence that is both new and material:

  • New: The evidence was not available at the time of the original decision, and the applicant could not reasonably have presented it earlier.
  • Material: The evidence is significant enough to potentially change the outcome of the case.

Examples of evidence that could support a motion to reopen include:

  • Newly discovered documents supporting eligibility for a visa or green card.
  • Evidence of changed country conditions for asylum or withholding of removal claims.
  • Proof of ineffective assistance of prior counsel, such as failure to submit key evidence.
  • New medical records or personal circumstances that were not previously documented.

The Process of Filing a Motion to Reopen

Filing a motion to reopen involves several important steps:

  1. Case Review: The denial must be carefully analyzed to determine what evidence could alter the outcome.
  2. Collecting New Evidence: Applicants must gather documents, affidavits, or other forms of proof that were previously unavailable.
  3. Drafting the Motion: The motion must explain clearly why the new information matters and how it could change the decision.
  4. Filing with the Appropriate Body: The motion is filed with USCIS, the BIA, or the immigration court, depending on the case.
  5. Awaiting Review: The decision-making body re-examines the case and either grants the motion (reopening the case) or denies it.

Why Motions to Reopen Matter in Immigration

Immigration law does not always allow for a second chance, but the motion to reopen provides one of the few avenues for reconsidering a case. This procedural tool is especially important in situations where critical evidence was missing, overlooked, or unavailable during the initial proceedings. Without it, individuals may be left with no way to introduce facts that could make them eligible for relief.

For example:

  • A marriage-based green card case may have been denied for lack of bona fide marriage evidence, but new documents or affidavits may now be available.
  • An asylum applicant’s claim may have been denied, but conditions in their home country may have since worsened significantly.
  • A worker denied a visa may now have additional employment records proving their eligibility.

In each of these scenarios, a motion to reopen gives applicants a chance to strengthen their case and pursue the outcome they deserve.

Risks and Limitations of Motions to Reopen

While motions to reopen are valuable, they are not without risks and challenges:

  • Strict Deadlines: Missing the 90-day filing window can eliminate the opportunity to file, except in certain exceptions.
  • Limited Chances: In most cases, only one motion to reopen is permitted.
  • Same Decision Maker: The same agency or court that issued the denial reviews the motion, which can make success difficult.
  • High Burden of Proof: The applicant must show that the new evidence is material and could change the outcome.

Because of these challenges, filing a motion to reopen requires careful preparation and strong legal arguments.

Practical Tips for a Strong Motion to Reopen

  • Act Quickly: Don’t wait until the filing deadline approaches; start gathering new evidence immediately.
  • Document Thoroughly: Provide as much supporting documentation as possible to strengthen the motion.
  • Explain Clearly: The motion should not only present new evidence but also explain why it matters.
  • Seek Professional Help: Immigration law is complex, and the guidance of an experienced attorney can significantly increase the chance of success.

Real-World Example

Consider an individual whose asylum claim was denied due to lack of sufficient evidence. A year later, the political situation in their home country deteriorates significantly, and they can now provide reports and affidavits proving that returning would place them in danger. In this situation, a motion to reopen based on changed country conditions may allow the case to be reconsidered, even beyond the typical 90-day deadline.

Conclusion

A motion to reopen is a crucial tool for immigrants facing denied petitions, applications, or relief in removal proceedings. By introducing new and material evidence, applicants can request that their cases be revisited and evaluated in light of the updated information. Though strict deadlines, high standards, and procedural complexities exist, this motion offers a valuable second chance for many individuals seeking lawful status or protection in the United States. Partnering with an experienced immigration law firm in Los Angeles can make the difference between success and failure. The right immigration law firm in Los Angeles understands the intricacies of the process, the evidentiary requirements, and the arguments most likely to persuade adjudicators. For those navigating denials and considering this path, working with a trusted immigration law firm in Los Angeles ensures that every detail is handled strategically and with the best chance for a favorable outcome.

FAQ

What is the difference between a motion to reopen and a motion to reconsider?
A motion to reopen is based on new evidence that was not previously available, while a motion to reconsider focuses on legal errors in the original decision.

How long do I have to file a motion to reopen?
Generally, you must file within 90 days of the final decision. Exceptions apply in certain cases, such as asylum claims based on changed country conditions.

Can I file more than one motion to reopen?
Typically, only one motion to reopen is permitted, though exceptions may exist in cases involving asylum or if DHS agrees to join the motion.

What kind of evidence can I submit with a motion to reopen?
You can submit documents, affidavits, or other proof that was not available during the initial decision and that is significant enough to change the outcome.

Do I need an attorney to file a motion to reopen?
While not required, working with an immigration attorney greatly improves your chances of success, given the legal and procedural complexities involved.

Can an immigration law firm in Los Angeles help with my case?
Yes, an experienced immigration attorney can evaluate your situation, gather strong evidence, and file a persuasive motion to reopen on your behalf.

Speak with our Attorneys

A.R., Mexico
A.R., Mexico
"I wanted to say once again thank you. For just giving my a shot and helping me out. You have forever changed my life and I am eternally grateful."
"Client arrived in the United States at age 2, graduated from high school with honors and earned both an Associate’s Degree and Certificate in Culinary Arts but still could not work due to undocumented status. Granted Deferred Action Status in 2014 following successful post-conviction relief eliminating client's prior misdemeanor driving under the influence."
C.L., Mexico
C.L., Mexico
"I just wanted to thank you for ALL the hard work and dedication you put into my case. Just wanted you to know that I really appreciate everything you’ve done."
"Client has been a lawful permanent resident since age 2 and is now able to apply for a discretionary waiver of criminal grounds of deportation after we modified client's conviction to a non-aggravated felony."
H.R., Peru
H.R., Peru
"I appreciate everything you did for me!"
Name Withheld
Name Withheld
Client now qualifies for citizenship and is no longer deportable after we eliminated an aggravated felony conviction in a post-conviction motion.